New Hampshire’s Lottery Spending Has Skyrocketed

lottery

Many ancient documents reference the practice of drawing lots to determine ownership of land and property. In the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, this practice became common in Europe. The first time lottery funding was tied to the United States was in 1612 when King James I of England created a lottery to provide funds for the settlement of Jamestown, Virginia. Public and private organizations soon began using the money raised by the lottery to fund towns, wars, colleges, and public-works projects.

New York has the largest cumulative sales of any lottery

Since 1964, the state of New Hampshire has operated a lottery. Since then, spending has skyrocketed, thanks to rising jackpots. Even people who do not normally gamble have bought tickets in the powerball jackpot drawing in January 2016.

This growth in lottery revenue comes despite the fact that lottery players are mostly from high-income neighborhoods. The lottery’s revenue covers the cost of operating the lottery as well as advertising. The revenue from lottery plays amounted to almost $370 per person in Delaware, Rhode Island, and West Virginia in 2010. That’s a lot of money, and even the smallest tickets add up. In 2012, lottery income in California, Massachusetts, and New York was over $4 billion. By 2014, lottery revenues in New York topped $9 billion.

Massachusetts has the highest percentage return to any state government from a lottery

The Massachusetts State Lottery targets the five most profitable frequent cashers for increased advertising. According to a report from the Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Massachusetts has the highest return on investment of any state government from lottery advertising. The lottery in Massachusetts generates $626 per dollar spent on advertising, compared to $79 per dollar in New York. But that number may not be representative of the total return on investment.

The Massachusetts lottery returns the largest percentage of its total revenue. Compared to corporate taxes, the Massachusetts lottery revenue is less than a third of the total amount of corporate tax revenue. While many critics argue that the state lottery is an unfair taxation scheme, Massachusetts actually receives the highest return on investment from lottery advertising. The revenue generated by the lottery is then redistributed throughout the state, including paying out prizes to winners and operating expenses for local governments.

New Hampshire has the smallest cumulative sales of any lottery

In 1964, New Hampshire became the first state to establish a state-run lottery. Since then, spending has soared, primarily due to the large jackpots. Even those who do not typically gamble may have bought a Powerball ticket in January 2016 – the state’s record-breaking drawing. Even state officials who have opposed the lottery have come out in favor of it, arguing that it is an effective way to raise revenue for state and local governments.

The average prize payout is only about half of the lottery’s cumulative sales, and state profit is just a fraction of that. According to La Fleur, the state makes only 34% of its total sales. The rest of the money is split between administration costs and payments to retailers. While some states make big money from lottery sales, others struggle to cover their costs. New Hampshire’s comparatively small sales numbers may indicate a poor economy, but the lottery is still a major source of revenue for the state.